InclusionAI Models

8 modelsGeneral models free to startUp to 262K context

Usage

Last 30 days · 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-31

Tokens

9.5M

Requests

915

Models in use

8 of 8

Tokens per day, stacked by model

03.4M6.8M10-0210-0910-1610-2310-302026-10-02 — 0 tokens2026-10-03 — 37,530 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 37,5302026-10-04 — 130,235 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 130,2352026-10-05 — 1,055 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1,0552026-10-06 — 6,831,625 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 6,831,6252026-10-07 — 210 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 2102026-10-08 — 3,220 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 3,2202026-10-09 — 0 tokens2026-10-10 — 3,200 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 3,2002026-10-11 — 0 tokens2026-10-12 — 76,760 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 76,7602026-10-13 — 0 tokens2026-10-14 — 0 tokens2026-10-15 — 0 tokens2026-10-16 — 0 tokens2026-10-17 — 350 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 3502026-10-18 — 0 tokens2026-10-19 — 35,400 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 35,4002026-10-20 — 2,290 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 2,2902026-10-21 — 269,900 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 269,9002026-10-22 — 0 tokens2026-10-23 — 1,040 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1,0402026-10-24 — 1,005 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1,0052026-10-25 — 110 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1102026-10-26 — 1,945 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1,9452026-10-27 — 10,380 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 10,3802026-10-28 — 100,865 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 100,8652026-10-29 — 1,727,525 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 1,727,5252026-10-30 — 825 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 8252026-10-31 — 233,125 tokens ling-3.0-flash: 233,125

Which models that traffic went to

  1. Ling 3.0 Flash100.0%9.5M

Share of 9.5M tokens. 7 models with traffic report no token counts and cannot be ranked here, including ling-3.0-tiny-free and ling-3.0-flash-free — they are in the request view.

The two views disagree on purpose: a model can take a large share of the calls and a small share of the tokens — many short requests — or the reverse. Which one matters depends on whether your cost is driven by call volume or by prompt length. Measured on AIHubMix over the last 30 days, counting the 8 model IDs listed on this page; traffic routed through upstream-specific IDs that are not in the public catalog is not included.

All 8 InclusionAI Models

Open in model list
InclusionAI models on AIHubMix with input and output modalities, context length, maximum output, price per million tokens including cache read and cache write rates, and measured throughput and latency.
Modalities
ling-3.0-flash-freeTakes text, returns text.262KFreeFree/M———
ling-3.0-tiny-freeTakes text, returns text.262KFreeFree/M———
ling-3.0-flashTakes text, returns text.262K$0.06$0.18/M$0.012/M121 tok/s1.04 s
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0Takes text, returns text.128K$0.068$0.272/M—81 tok/s0.83 s
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0Takes text, returns text.128K$0.136$0.544/M—9 tok/s0.46 s
inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0Takes text, returns text.128K$0.136$0.544/M———
inclusionAI/Ling-1TTakes text, returns text.128K$0.548$2.192/M———
inclusionAI/Ring-1TTakes text, returns text.128K$0.548$2.192/M———

Prices are USD per million tokens; cache read and cache write are the rates for prompt-cache hits and for writing a prompt into the cache. Throughput and latency are measured on AIHubMix — the same figures the model detail page shows — not vendor claims. A dash means the catalog does not publish that field for that model, which is not the same as the model not supporting it.

InclusionAI on AIHubMix

Which InclusionAI model should I start with?

ling-3.0-flash-free is free on input — the cheapest entry here that declares tool calling, and it carries a 262K context. Move up to inclusionAI/Ling-1T when answer quality matters more than cost, or to ling-3.0-tiny-free for long-form reasoning.

Which of these models reason before answering?

4 of the 8 models here declare a reasoning phase — they work through the problem before producing an answer, which helps on multi-step problems at the cost of extra output tokens. Use the Reasoning filter above the table to see them. The catalog does not record anything further about how they differ, so this page does not sort them into families.

Why are there several entries for the same model?

Because each row is a route you can call, not a model release. Some IDs name an upstream (azure-, alicloud-, cc-), some are the open-weight repository form (inclusionAI/…), and some differ only in capitalisation, kept so older integrations keep working.

The catalog does not carry a field saying which of those a given row is, so this page does not sort them into buckets it would have to invent. Every row shows that route’s own price, context and speed — compare those directly, and open a model to see the upstreams that serve it.

How is cached input billed?

The Cache read column is the rate for input tokens served from the prompt cache — for example ling-3.0-flash bills cache hits at 20% of the input rate. Cache write is the surcharge for putting a prompt into the cache in the first place, and only a few upstreams bill it separately. A dash in either column means the catalog carries no cache rate for that model, so plan on paying the full input rate.

Do I need a separate InclusionAI account?

No. One AIHubMix key covers every model on this page, and switching between them is a change to the model string — billing, rate limits, and logs stay in one place.

Start calling InclusionAI in one line

One key, one endpoint, 941 models across 46 model authors.