← Models

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.2

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 from Anthropic and GLM 5.2 from Z.AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5Z.AIGLM 5.2
Anthropic logo
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic · text, image → text

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic’s next-generation product, designed for high-throughput, cost-sensitive tasks. It can reliably handle fast and repetitive workloads such as summarization, context compression, database queries, and classification requests. It is also well suited to be used as a sub-agent model in programming workflows alongside Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5.

Input$0.1 /M
Output$0.5 /M
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268 /M
Output$3.9438 /M
Cache read$0.2817 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Haiku 5.5
GLM 5.2
Input /M
$0.1
$1.1268
Output /M
$0.5
$3.9438
Cache read /M
-
$0.2817
Context length
1,000,000
1,000,000
Max output
128,000
131,072
Time to First Token
0.6 s
0.6 s
Throughput
187.4 tok/s
35.7 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
October 8, 2026
June 16, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-haiku-5-5glm-5.2

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-haiku-5-5glm-5.2

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

WebDev Arena
claude-haiku-5-5glm-5.2
1560158016001620
Overall
15861604

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Claude Haiku 5.5
$13.50 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Haiku 5.5, GLM 5.2?

Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.5/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.9438/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 0.6s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 and GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Haiku 5.5 and 131,072 tokens on GLM 5.2.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Haiku 5.5 at 187.4 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 35.7 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts text and image input; GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Claude Haiku 5.5 and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.